All-Powerful, Good God in a world with Evil - Is it consistent?

            Natural disasters, wars, and disease are nearly universally recognized as evil and must be reconciled logically if we are to accept the very existence of an all powerful loving God. At face value the problems of moral and physical evil in the world appear to directly conflict with the idea of an all-powerful, good, Creator, yet they are reconcilable.

            First of all, in recognizing evil we must presume that there is a moral standard on which to weigh our viewpoint of the world. If all we know is that of natural process divorced from contingency on a necessary being, then evil is only imaginative or at best an unfounded dogmatic assertion. In fact I would be justified in saying that disasters, wars, and disease are all good because they are part of nature, the highest power, and thus the highest authority. However, if we recognize the presence of such things as evil, then we may continue to search for the source of such a standard by which we judge. Frankly, I can only infer why God permits evil within the confines of man’s willful decisions. The late English preacher Charles Spurgeon stated, “I cannot tell you why God permits moral evil, neither can the ablest philosopher on earth, nor the highest angel in heaven.” However, aside from the question why, we can ask, how can God, being all powerful, and all loving, permit evil? This is the nature of the problem, how can these facts logically coexist?

            We should separate two distinct evils addressed in your question. Moral evil simply yet not equivocally understood as sin should be addressed first as it is a predecessor of natural evil. Moral evil can be defined as “evil produced by the activities of moral agents.”[1] Rape, child abuse, lying, cheating - the list of moral evils cannot perhaps be contained in the binding of a single book. In light of Biblical revelation the potential of moral evil was available to the first moral agents on earth, Adam and Eve, made aware if not for the first time by a serpent, a mere instrument of the fallen angel, Lucifer, who by his own pride transgressed his position in God’s created order. (Eze 28:16, Gen 3:1, Rev 20:2) Evil officially entered the world at a finite time through the first man, Adam, bringing death to mankind and a curse to the creation. (Rom 5:12, Rom 8:22, Gen 3:17) It is also important to understand that in order to measure qualitatively there must be a standard and that in the beginning God measured the world and declared it “very good”. (Gen 1:31) The first moral violation on earth came when Adam disobeyed the standard spoken by God regarding the eating of fruit that God specifically forbade him to eat. The violation of God’s moral standard brought punitive results. In the time of Noah God once again put an end to rampant moral evil by destroying the earth with a flood. (Gen 6:11-13) God gave mankind autonomy in moral reasoning, and yet He requires trust and obedience to those created from nothing, yet in His likeness; Adam failed followed by all mankind. (Gen 1:27, Rom 3:23) One theologian compares the fall of man with the initial splash of a rock thrown in a quiet pond which is “followed by a continuous sequence of ripples,” the ripples are an inevitable succession.[2] Moral evil is explicitly caused by moral agents outside of the perfect will of God, albeit permitted by God for a certain time (2 Tim 4:1, Psalm 9:8, Rom 2:15-16) The groaning of our cursed earth and the disruption of the natural order will one day be fixed, but for now it is a constant reminder of the consequence of sin. (Romans 8:22) It is important not to confuse patience of a just God in judging sin with the nonexistence of a loving God due to sin’s presence. (Rom 2:4)

            The natural evil in the world is present because of sin. The creation “became the recipient of divine judgment” through mankind’s rebellion.[3] We see the effects everywhere. Natural evil could be described as “evil that occurs in the process of the functioning of the natural order.”[4] It is important to not attempt to affix all apparent evils to God’s just judgment on sin. For example, forest fires can cleanse from disease and blight, blizzards can provide necessary precipitation to maintain sufficient water levels, and often times the loss of life is caused by discernible dangers overlooked by the choices of man. (Chambers) Also, obedience to God’s law can prevent natural evils. For example if every person on earth would adhere to the Biblical standard of one man and one woman for marriage, sexually transmitted diseases could be theoretically eliminated in only a few generations. Another interesting example of moral adherence to Divine law negating natural suffering can be found in the accounts of The Bubonic Plague. Jewish communities suffered significantly lower death rates during the ordeal because of their geographical separation and also because of their adherence to Levitical sanitation laws, which drastically lowered the population of rats carrying lice infected with the disease.[5]

            The basic understanding of three premises: God is good, all powerful, and evil is permitted does logically direct us in one avenue. God in His chosen creation cannot logically remove all evil for a specific reason. The two most theologically warranted viewpoints of evil’s presence are of God’s allowance of evil as a “benign” albeit logically irreducible side effect of free will or more finitely the freedom for moral reasoning in man.[6] The second parallels the Apostle Paul in God’s “twofold purpose of evil” that men should freely act rightly toward another and for awareness of the absence of relationship with God.[7] Pessimistic philosophical viewpoints ultimately usurp God’s goodness by having it succumb to His power, while optimists or Universalists subvert God’s justice to His love, ultimately failing to ratify essential attributes of God. Any test of the validity of one’s theodicy is that system’s internal consistency.[8] Simply stating premises from a contradicting system of belief does not disprove that system; however a logically inconsistent system of belief is disproved already. Likewise, while I disagree with the theology of these other systems, they can be presented with a degree logical consistency. According to the Theocentric (opposed to an anthrocentric) testimony of Scripture, I hold that the two- fold purpose of evil is essential in understanding God’s deserved glory and His permission of evil in our world. Pastor and author John MacArthur asserts that God “has allowed evil and sin within His sovereign purposes so that His holiness and grace might be put on display.” (MacArthur 2009) As a necessary being, it is not logically fitting that God should look outside of his own attributes to act, and thus His highest priority of action is that of His own nature. Without evil, mankind cannot know God’s mercy in reconciliation, and without free moral reasoning, man cannot actively love His Creator-Redeemer.

            Aside from these philosophical quandaries lies a more personal aspect of evil contained in the religious problem of evil, namely in the experience of pain wrought by the effects. Pain is most often referred to as “physical sensation of ill feeling” or “emotional or mental stress” and it touches everyone on earth.[9] Perhaps pain or anguish in our life on this earth can best be reconciled in the act of the cross whereby God came into humanity in order to purchase back his bride from a fallen, cursed world. It becomes more evident that God patiently endures sin in order to work out His purposes of redemption for the sake of His own deserved glory. (Rom 9:22) However, God did not remove Himself so far as to not subject His only begotten Son to a most repugnant and undeserving death. This reality may be realized as He prayed to His Father in the Garden of Gethsemane. (Luke 22:44) “And being in anguish, he [Jesus] prayed more earnestly, and his sweat was like drops of blood falling to the ground. (Luke 22:44) The condition of Hematohidrosis is a testimony to the anguish endured in expectation of the agony of the cross.[10] Jesus Christ, fully God and fully man with no mixture of essence persevered being falsely accused, beaten, and crucified on a Roman cross, perhaps the most brutal execution in any time. The reality of the atoning blood shed by Jesus Christ was purposed in the Father’s mind before the foundation of the World. (1 Pet 1:20; Rev 13:8) And so we have a High Priest in Jesus who is able to sympathize with our human nature and the suffering of pain. (Heb 4:15) God has solved the problem of pain, though it is through faith in Christ and His atoning work according to His Word, and we who believe will one day be separated from all evil, pain, and even the memory of such existence (Rev 21:4).

             It is most certainly possible to honestly question and seek truth in relation to God without attacking Him. Yet, one must likewise honestly pursue truth in the Lord Jesus Christ, because “without faith it is impossible to please Him, for he who comes to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him. (Heb 11:6)

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Lester, Rob. Jewish Sanitary Laws Came from God. Creation Faith Facts.http://preachrr.wordpress.com/2010/04/17/jewish-sanitary-laws-came-from-god/ (accessed March 30, 2012).

Taylor, Paul. “Did Jesus Really Sweat Drops of Blood?” www.ChristianAnswers.net.http://christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-t018.html (accessed March 30, 2012).

Towns, Elmer L. Theology For Today. 2nd ed. Mason, Ohio, USA: Cengage Learning, 2008.

Chambers, Aaron. “Http: //mylordandmyblog.wOrdpress.cOm/2011/06/02/moral-and-natural-evil/.” My Lord and My Blog. Entry posted June 2, 2011 .http://mylordandmyblog.wordpress.com/2011/06/02/moral-and-natural-evil/ (accessed March 28, 2012).

Elwell, Walter A., ed. Evangelical Dictionary of Theology. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 2001.

Lester, Rob. “Jewish Sanitary Laws Came from God.” Creation Faith Facts.http://preachrr.wordpress.com/2010/04/17/jewish-sanitary-laws-came-from-god/ (accessed March 30, 2012).

Vermeer, Paul. Learning Theodicy: the Problem of Evil and the Praxis of Religious Education. Boston: Brill Academic Pub, 1999.

Aaron Chambers, “Http: //mylordandmyblog.wOrdpress.cOm/2011/06/02/moral-and-natural-evil/,” My Lord and My Blog, entry posted June 2, 2011.  http://mylordandmyblog.wordpress.com/2011/06/02/moral-and-natural-evil/(accessed March 28, 2012).

MacArthur, John. Comment on “Macarthur On Theodicy.” Baa Baa Blog. Comment posted March 9, 2009.http://baasheepbaa.blogspot.com/2009/03/macarthur-on-theodicy.html (accessed March 31, 2012).

---

[1] Walter A. Elwell, ed., Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 2001), 414.

[2] Elmer L. Towns, Theology For Today, 2nd ed. (Mason, Ohio, USA: Cengage Learning, 2008), 504.

[3] Ibid., 505.

[4] Walter A. Elwell, ed., one Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 2001), 414.

[5] Rob Lester, “Jewish Sanitary Laws Came from God,” Creation Faith Facts,http://preachrr.wordpress.com/2010/04/17/jewish-sanitary-laws-came-from-god/ (accessed March 30, 2012).

[6] Walter A. Elwell, ed., Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 2001), 412.

[7] Paul Vermeer, Learning Theodicy: the Problem of Evil and the Praxis of Religious Education (Boston: Brill Academic Pub, 1999), 33.

[8] Walter A. Elwell, ed., Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 2001), 414.

[9] Ibid.,  882.

[10] Paul Taylor, “Did Jesus Really Sweat Drops of Blood?” www.ChristianAnswers.net, http://christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-t018.html (accessed March 30, 2012).

Jesus - God and Man

Jesus – God and Man

            Throughout the synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) Jesus’ humanity is assumed. He was born of a woman (Matthew 1:18), circumcised according to Jewish law (Luke 2:21), and He died (John 19:30). Philippians 2:7 states that Jesus “made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men.” His own neighbors recognized Him during his ministry saying, “Is not this the carpenter’s son? Is not his mother called Mary and his brethren James and Joseph, and Simon and Judas? (Matt 13:55) Jesus was a man, but we must not err regarding the nature and purpose of His humanity.

            Galatians 4:4 says, “But when the fullness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law.” Christ’s incarnation was of a specific and eternal purpose brought about within time, within humanity, and without conflict to His own Divine nature. Jesus claims this nature Himself on eight separate occasions in the Gospel of John. For example, “Jesus said unto them, ‘Verily, verily I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.” (John 8:58) This was a clear parallel between God as revealed in the Old Testament, and The Christ, “for by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him.” (Col 1:16)

            Jesus is, as you assume, one person. Scripture says:  “Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh; And declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead.” (Romans 1:3-4) Likewise, we understand that the eternal Son of God became flesh and dwelt among us. (John 1:14) So then eternally God, Jesus became a man as we see the clear Biblical message of His two distinct natures. This reality is most plainly described in the Apostle Paul’s epistle to the Colossian Church; “For in Him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily.” (Col 2:9) This understanding cannot be determined through metaphysical reason yet just because a truth is hard to grasp, the validity cannot be rejected. Nature refers to “the inherent character or basic constitution of a person or thing” or as defined by John Wolvoord “the real essence, the inward properties which underlie all outward manifestation.” (Towns 2008, 199)

            Why is this duality of nature so significant, because, there is enmity between the nature of God and the sinful nature of fallen humanity. Furthermore, God’s law was never intended to provide a path to God, but rather reveal our sinfulness. (Rom 3:20) “For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh.” (Romans 8:3) The person Jesus Christ exists with two natures, Divine and human, in one person without necessitating the amalgamation of the two natures in any way so that the enmity could be taken away, and peace could be procured between God and man.

            Jesus’ humanity is necessary for our salvation from sin’s proper consequence through God’s righteous punishment of sin. Jesus is a substitute “who His own self bore our sins in His body.” (1 Pet 2:24) He is the once for all blood sacrifice for the sins of those who receive Him, for “without shedding of blood there is no remission.” (Heb 9:22) Because of our personal violation of God’s law we are under the just wrath of a just God, yet by God’s grace through faith in His atoning work on the cross Jesus “is the propitiation for our sin.” (1 John 2:2) Likewise, Jesus has come to save us from the curse of the law of God. The Law is  a perfect representation of Gods expectations for the ideal man without sin, expressed from His nature. Yet to maintain righteousness a faultless fulfillment of such law over man must be fulfilled by a man, a necessity stated by Jesus Himself in Matthew 5:17. Without a means of salvation provided by God, mankind cannot be saved as was spoken by the prophet Jonah, “Salvation is of the Lord.” (Jon 2:9) Salvation is then through the God-man Jesus Christ, “having abolished in His flesh the enmity, [that is], the law of commandments [contained] in ordinances, so as to create in Himself one new man [from] the two, [thus] making peace, and that He might reconcile them both to God in one body through the cross, thereby putting to death the enmity.” (Eph 2:15) Jesus reconciled the enmity through offering Himself, perfect harmony of human nature and the nature of God, the acceptable sacrifice for the sin of sinful man. (Towns 2008, 220)

            We must be careful not to overemphasize Christ’s human or divine nature as He is fully God and fully man, no less God than the Father and no less man than you or me, yet He is a perfect man. This is a profound mystery revealed. Use this simple guideline to judge some of the problematic beliefs in Christology. If Christ isn’t fully man he cannot represent us as a fulfillment of righteousness as our propitiation. (Matt 5:17, Col 1:15, Rom 3:25) If Christ isn’t fully God, he cannot forgive sins or bring salvation as only God can forgive sins and salvation is of the Lord. (Jon 2:9, Mark 2:7) Early church fathers spoke in a way as to combat erroneous thinking such as Ebionatism. (Elwell 2001, 241) Jesus was not simply a man who was anointed by God; He is God in flesh who came into the world as the anointed King and who will one day in person reign eternally. God, being immutable, cannot become non-divine, as He reveals, “I the Lord your God do not change.” (Mal 3:6) The Gnostic claim that God cannot dwell in corrupt flesh disregards the “very good” creation of God in the beginning prior to the curse, and further that “the Word became flesh” to deliver the creation. (Gen 1:31, John 1:14) Similarly Arianism made Christ to be of an immutable nature like the Father, but not of one nature or substance with the father. (Elwell 2001, 95) This was quickly rejected by the Church Council of Nicea because it makes Christ to be a sort of demigod. As Moses declared in the Shema, “Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD;” and furthermore Jesus Himself claimed unity with the Father. (Deut 6:4, John 10:30)

            In His humanity Christ became the all encompassing necessity for our salvation. He likewise became our example through His humility, dependence upon the Father and the Word of God, freedom to forgive his own debtors, and his determined love for those who showed him no love on the cross. The Creator certainly is a personal God, “For we have not a high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like we are, yet without sin.” (Heb 4:15)

Bibliography

Towns, Elmer L. Theology For Today. 2nd ed. Pendleton, Or. (406 S. Main, Pendleton, Or.          97801): Cengage Learning, 2008.

Elwell, Walter A., ed. Evangelical Dictionary of Theology. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker   Academic, 2001.

Just Do It.

Dave Earley tells a story from a college class that he taught in his book Ministry Is... How To Serve Jesus With Passion and Confidence about a young woman who wanted to do something.

"One semester, on the next to last day of class, a student named Katie came up to me and asked me to pray for a lady to whom she was witnessing. Katie said that she worked with this lady and the lady had not been open to Christ. But the lady told her that she was behind on her payments and was going to lose her house if she could not come up with a large sum of money by the end of the week. 

I told Katie that I was not going to pray about it, but we were going to do something about it. I told the class about the situation, and some of the studnets with baseball hats passed them around like offering bags.

Within minutes the hats were filled with dollars. Katie counted it, and the total was $735!

The last day of class Katie came in with a big smile on her face. Then she told me that when she gave the lady a card with the money in it the lady started to cry . When she saw the $735, she turned white. It blew her away because she needed exactly that amount to make the rent payment and get groceries.

On top of that, Katie led the lady to Christ! This only happened because Katie and our class did something..."

What opportunities am I being given to just do it?

Chariots of Fire: An athlete that STOOD OUT

1924 World Record (400m)

Have you ever faced a tough decision in life? We all do at times. Sometimes difficult decisions revolve around us, and sometimes they are difficult because of other people that will be affected. As a fairly non-famous person most of my decisions aren't known by a big group of people, and I imagine that the same is true for you. Many times it seems like the more other people know our business the harder it is to make tough choices. I'd like you to consider the choices that were made by a man named Eric Liddell, a committed christian, dedicated teacher, foreign missionary to China, and just by chance an Olympic gold medalist. Liddell made some difficult choices in His life. He stood firm in his conscience to honor God, answered the call to go serve, and stood out of the crowd in his desire to honor God in all he did. Check out this short biography of Eric Liddell, "The Flying Scotsman."

Click here to read a short BIO of Eric Liddell

Where did we get the idea of Eugenics?

Where did we get the idea of Eugenics?

The ascribed value of human life is perhaps a most notable outcrop of the philosophical garden of a man. Perhaps the two most distinguishably diverse frameworks supporting these presuppositions are Darwinian macro-evolution and conversely the Biblical origin of life revealed through a historical grammatical (literal) reading of the creation account in book of Genesis. When discussing the value of life we must directly observe each framework’s cause for the origin of life. Darwinian evolution ascribes a mysterious transformation from nonliving chemicals subsequently followed by plethora of randomly mutated life forms of compounding traits as the origin of man. Contrarily, a Biblical philosophy is grounded upon a personal Creator. Therefore human value is governed upon an “unalienable right” given by God, because “God created man in His own image.” (Gen 1:27)

When asserting the effects in social behavior in a field such as eugenics it becomes apparent how quickly these frameworks contradict. The Eugenics movement can be traced back to Fancis Galton who coined the term in 1883 referring to a “moral philosophy to improve humanity by encouraging the ablest and healthiest people to have more children.” [1] In Galton’s ideal the evolutionary interpretation of natural selection was being helped along by those most fit to recognize its preeminent benefits to humanity. This Ideology was evident in the sterilization movement of the 1920-30’s in America. The first law was passed in Indiana through the influence of Harry Clay Sharp. Sharp wanted vasectomies used to “prevent the transmission of degenerate traits” of prisoners, an apparent outcrop of the Evolutionary mindset. [2] This practice was legalized in 30 states, and eventually practice on citizens deemed mentally ill was legalized in the landmark Buck vs. Bell case. It is no surprise that this ideology spread most quickly and thoroughly among nations who had adopted a Darwinian model of origin. Although, in the case of Buck vs. Bell the supporting scientific evidence was later found to be fraudulent and flawed, over 60,000 Americans were forcibly sterilized through the 1970's. The value of life controversy continues to be battled in America and the world.

Negative eugenics is still practiced today in the form of abortion. Consequently, the majority atheistic, agnostic, and consequently evolutionary school of thought permits parents’ pleasure and reduced economic stress to supersede the paradigm of value given to each human being by the Creator of life. As it is written, “ Your eyes saw my substance, being yet unformed. And in Your book they all were written, The days fashioned for me, When as yet there were none of them...” (Psalm 139:16)

---

[1] Elof Carlson, “Scientific Origins of Eugenics,” Eugenics Archive, http://www.eugenicsarchive.org/eugenics/list2.pl (accessed June 27, 2012).

[2] “Buck Vs Bell Supreme Court Decision,” Eugenics Archive,http://www.eugenicsarchive.org/eugenics/list2.pl (accessed June 27, 2012).

Thinking About The Brain

Thinking about the Brain

The human brain has approximately 100 billion cells, comparable to the number of stars in the Milky Way Galaxy. What stretch of the mind’s perception to think so vast an array in space could be likewise contained in the 3 lb mass of tissue of our own brain. Institute of Creation Research (ICR) scientists as well as many others who hold to the truth that man has not evolved from lesser life forms hold this powerful tool of the memory in high regard for evidence of God’s handiwork.

The human brain, the supercomputer of the mind, carries out necessary functions using cells called neurons and galials. These cells are transported along memory traces or memory engrams (not to be confused with the erroneous teachings of scientology) allowing the cells to connect via synapses. These functions contain incomprehensibly complex systems, only functionally understood by science, that allow categorized, systematic memory functions to be carried out. A major argument for the functional form in the creation of the brain is the lack in benefit brought about by an incomplete system. However, the fully functioning brain is a mastery of “Supply Chains” that put UPS and just about anything else to shame.

One amazing, yet simple thought about the functioning brain is the nature of memory itself. Without memory communication would be impossible. The mind must have conscious and determined recall of previously stored information. Perhaps even more amazing than systematic organization is the ability to decipher between declarative and procedural information along with the “sorting” of long term, short term, and working memory. These abilities reveal a purpose and plan behind the creation of such a marvelous system.

^he system of memory in the human brain is cleverly unique. Most animals are given instincts that govern various aspects of their behavior while humans learn many diverse behaviors and abilities generally determined by preference. Likewise, the “knowledge of good and evil” may be deciphered according to moral truth, though mankind, when left unattended, sadly chooses unwisely apart from our Creator. We are truly created in God’s image, and the human brain is the tool that sets the mind apart in the human’s being.

Thoughts About The Bible

THOUGHTS ABOUT THE BIBLE

Have you ever read Popular Mechanics? I really enjoy all the diagrams and photographs with trendy cutting edge gadgets. But, even with all this cool imagery, many of the articles were simply based on concepts; some will work while others will someday look foolish and naive. When men work together they may find a way to produce unified print, yet time will reveal its flaws. However, when we look at the Bible in this way we begin to see a unique collection of writing put together in such a way that time has only further confirmed its accuracy. Although the Bible does address science and technology during different periods of authorship, it is not concerned with social trends or latest, greatest technology. Its information, directions, and commands are nearly inexhaustible in topic yet this collection of writings has one basic purpose; to reveal the Living God and His plan of redemption through His Son, Jesus Christ. The account was compiled by more than 30 writers over a span of over 1,500 years between Moses and John yet with perfect harmony of message. 

No other literature can even begin to claim a unity as such. Authors did not seek personal gain, nor did they seek fame as they generally were rejected by the masses because of the messages delivered. This is particularly evident of the Prophets. Speaking on the Lord’s behalf over 3,000 times, they delivered messages of warning, comfort, future hope, or imminent destruction of men. In fact, the truthfulness and historical accuracy of these claims sets the Bible apart from every other book claiming Divine authority. Jesus alone fulfilled dozens of specific Old Testament prophecies indirectly or directly. Josh MacDowel, a former atheist, calculated the odds of Jesus fulfilling merely 8 prophecies at 1 in 100,000,000,000,000,000. Jesus Himself frequently acknowledged the authority previously revealed about Him. He claimed that the authority was given to Him by the Father on occasions and at other times He revealed His inherent authority as God, such as “to forgive sins.” (Mark 2) This compilation of evidence infers strongly that the Bible is authoritative. As God’s revelation through men, its accuracy and internal witness demand reverence for the commands and guidelines set in place throughout the scripture. Just as the prophecies have come to pass until now, what makes us think that they will cease in our lifetime?

You may think that since God delivered scripture through men that it can’t be trusted. That just isn’t the case. God inspired the original authors as Paul writes that “All scripture is God breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness.” (2 Tim 3:16). God, through the work of The Holy Spirit guided the writing process in such a way to perfectly communicate His message through Paul, not by Paul’s intuition, understanding of concept, or personal ability. The authorship and authority has been claimed by God, so no other position carries the implication to fruition except God as author through men. Such a collection of writings certainly requires a miraculous act as their cause. Jesus Himself, claimed that “the scripture cannot be broken” in John 10:34-35. Meaning there are no gaps, breaks, or holes by which the content and truthfulness should slip through or be tarnished.
The Bible in its original autograph and intended context is eternally true and accurate in content. It is inerrant. Just as the Apostle Paul claimed scripture to be God-breathed he claimed its authoritative nature in that it “is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness." As Jesus has claim to authority in scripture by His unique position, being the perfect fulfillment of prophetic insight, we do well to examine His views of the bible. He says, in John 17:17, “Sanctify them by thy word, thy word is truth.” Jesus is claiming that the inspired Word is Truth. Apart from the internal witness of scripture we also know that the earliest church fathers held a similar view of the Scripture. Likewise, judging the Word of God according to the character of God we know that a God who is “light” must certainly provide only truth in revealing Himself to mankind.
Beyond the honest pursuit of truth, I and millions of others before me have come to experience the truthfulness of God’s Word through its life changing power delivered in the Gospel. Without the life giving Word of God I have no other explanation for my own changed life. A life beginning in deviation even in those things I knew to be wrong. Through relying the Word of God I have become a changed man. That is the nature of the Bible. Its content is powerful, “sharper than any double edged sword,” and its truth will cut to the deepest level, the spirit of a man. As the “Word was made flesh” (John 1:14) the Word of God carries the sanctifying authority of God. What else can we do with the message of our Creator except trust and obey?